A prospective framework to support climate-adaptive fisheries in Canada
FACETS, January 2023
Daniel G. Boyce, Nancy Shackell, Phil Greyson, Blair Greenan
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||8||57%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||3||21%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||22%|
|Student > Master||2||22%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||22%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from FACETS
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 439,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FACETS
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.